How do I make decisions as a manager when I’m not yet sure?

september 27, 2026

As a leader, you can make decisions without complete certainty by working with enough information to act responsibly, combined with a clear decision-making strategy. Waiting for certainty is itself a choice — and often the worst one. Leadership requires learning to treat uncertainty as a constant, not an exception. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about making decisions as a leader when you’re not entirely sure yet.

Why is deciding under uncertainty so difficult for leaders?

Deciding under uncertainty is difficult because leaders are accountable for the consequences of their choices, while rarely having access to all relevant information. That combination of responsibility and incomplete information creates an internal brake that feels rational but undermines your effectiveness.

What reinforces that brake is the fear of making mistakes that are visible to others. As a leader, you’re in the spotlight. A wrong decision isn’t just felt internally — it’s also observed externally by colleagues, employees, or stakeholders. That makes the threshold for deciding psychologically heavier than when you’re making choices only for yourself.

On top of that, many leaders — and women in leadership roles in particular — have grown up with the implicit message that you shouldn’t speak up until you’re certain. Research into behavioral patterns in organizations shows that women more often tend toward consultation and deliberation, while organizational culture rewards decisiveness. That tension makes decision-making especially fraught.

Yet uncertainty is not a sign of weakness or inadequacy. It is a realistic feature of complex organizations. Leaders who learn to navigate that uncertainty — without being paralyzed by it — build lasting leadership.

What is the difference between a good decision and a certain decision?

A good decision is one you make based on the best available information, a clear goal, and a thoughtful process. A certain decision barely exists. The outcome of a decision does not, in hindsight, determine whether it was a good decision at the time you made it.

This distinction is crucial for strategic decision-making as a leader. You can take all the right steps and still get an unfavorable outcome, simply because external factors are unpredictable. Conversely, you can get lucky with a poorly considered choice. The quality of a decision should therefore be judged on the process, not solely on the result.

A good decision is characterized by:

A clearly defined problem or question
An understanding of the interests of all parties involved
A deliberate weighing of alternatives
Acceptable risk given the context
The ability to explain the reasoning afterward, regardless of the outcome

Leaders who internalize this distinction stop waiting for certainty and start investing in a sound decision-making process. That is the essence of leadership under uncertainty.

What is the minimum information you need before making a decision?

Before making a decision as a leader, you need at least three things: a clear picture of what the problem actually is, an understanding of the main consequences of the options available to you, and a sense of who has a stake in the outcome. More is helpful, but this is the minimum needed to act responsibly.

A common mistake is that leaders keep gathering more information to push away the discomfort of uncertainty. This is known as analysis paralysis: the feeling that you need one more report, one more opinion, or one more meeting before you can act. The result is that the decision never comes, while the situation keeps moving forward.

A practical rule of thumb: ask yourself which piece of information would actually change your decision. If the answer is “none,” you have enough. If there is one specific piece of data missing that would make a real difference, go get it. Everything beyond that is procrastination.

With every decision, also ask yourself: what is the cost of waiting? Sometimes not deciding is more expensive than making an imperfect choice. That trade-off is part of decision-making as a leader.

How do you balance intuition and data when making a decision?

Intuition and data are not opposites. Intuition is compressed experience: your brain’s ability to recognize patterns you can’t consciously articulate. Data provide structure and objectivity. The strongest decisions as a leader combine both — data provides context, and intuition points the direction.

When you take the data seriously as a leader but still feel a nagging doubt, it’s worth exploring that doubt rather than dismissing it. Ask yourself: what do I know that the data isn’t showing? What pattern do I recognize from previous situations? Sometimes intuition points to a blind spot in the available information.

At the same time, watch out for the opposite: intuition rooted in bias or fear. Not every gut feeling is wisdom. A good way to test this is to say your reasoning out loud to someone you trust. If you can’t explain it, it may not be intuition — it may be avoidance.

As a rule of thumb: use data to map out your options, and use your intuition to determine the final direction. Don’t let data paralyze you, and don’t let intuition make you overconfident.

When do you ask others for input, and when do you decide on your own?

Asking others for input is valuable when they have information you don’t, when the decision directly affects them, or when buy-in is essential for implementation. You decide on your own when the decision falls within your mandate, when additional input would only slow the process down, or when you bear ultimate responsibility.

A common pitfall for leaders — especially women in leadership positions — is over-consulting others as a way to spread responsibility. That feels safe, but it undermines your credibility as a decision-maker. Employees expect a leader to make the call, even when it’s hard.

On the other hand, always deciding alone is dangerous. Leaders who never ask for input miss valuable perspectives and create an environment where employees feel unheard. That damages both the quality of decisions and working relationships.

A practical framework for determining the right approach:

Consult others when the decision is complex, you’re missing information, or implementation depends on their cooperation
Decide on your own when the decision is urgent, you have the most relevant information, or consulting would create more confusion than clarity
Delegate when the decision is better made by someone closer to the situation

How do you communicate a decision when you still have doubts yourself?

You communicate a decision as a leader — even when you have doubts — by being clear about the choice itself and honest about the context. That doesn’t mean hiding your uncertainty, but it also doesn’t mean offloading that uncertainty onto your employees. Transparency and decisiveness are not mutually exclusive.

An effective way to do this is to distinguish between the decision and the outcome. You can say: “We’re going with this direction because it’s the best assessment we can make right now based on what we know. We’ll monitor the results and adjust as needed.” That’s not weakness. That’s realism combined with leadership.

What you should avoid is packaging indecisiveness as openness. If you communicate a decision with so many qualifications that employees don’t know where they stand, you lose trust. People don’t follow a leader because that person is always right — they follow because that person gives direction.

Practical guidelines for communicating a decision under uncertainty:

State the decision explicitly and without hedging
Briefly explain the reasoning behind it
Acknowledge what you don’t yet know, without dwelling on it
Explain how you’ll monitor progress and when you’ll reassess
Invite questions, but close with a clear position

What do you do when a decision turns out to be wrong in hindsight?

When a decision turns out to be wrong in hindsight, acknowledge it as quickly as possible, analyze what you can learn from the process, and correct course where you can. Denying or defending mistakes costs more trust than naming them honestly.

A leader who acknowledges mistakes shows that she takes reality more seriously than her own image. That’s a powerful signal. Employees are generally far more forgiving of mistakes that are honestly named than of mistakes that are swept under the rug or rationalized.

What you concretely do when a decision goes wrong:

Acknowledge the situation without excessive self-criticism or apologies that undermine confidence
Analyze the process: was the information incomplete, was the timing off, or was the judgment simply incorrect?
Assess the damage and determine what’s needed to course-correct
Communicate clearly to those involved about what is changing and why
Draw lessons for future decision-making without getting stuck in self-criticism

Leaders who can process mistakes without being paralyzed by them build a culture where their employees also feel safe to experiment and learn. That is one of the most underrated aspects of women’s leadership and strategic leadership in general.

How we help you make decisions as a leader

Deciding under uncertainty is a skill, not an innate talent. And it’s a skill you can develop with the right tools, insights, and an environment where you feel safe to practice. That’s exactly what we offer at Intouch Women.

In our Masterclass Stratego for Women, you’ll learn not only how to make more strategic decisions, but also how to navigate the unwritten rules of organizations, how to build influence, and how to communicate your choices with confidence. In this program, we work concretely on:

Understanding your own decision-making style and where it sometimes works against you
Strategic analysis of situations and interests within your organization
Techniques for deciding and communicating with greater confidence
Hands-on practice in a safe group of ambitious women
Direct feedback from experienced coaches with decades of practical expertise

The program runs for six months and is based on our proven Stratego method, which has been helping women in leadership take charge of their careers and expand their impact for over 20 years. Ready to make decisions with more clarity and less doubt? Explore the Masterclass Stratego for Women and discover what it can do for you.

Veelgestelde vragen

How do I know if I've been waiting too long to make a decision?

A clear sign that you’ve been waiting too long is when gathering more information no longer produces new insights — it only delays the discomfort. Ask yourself: has the situation moved forward while I was still deliberating? If the answer is yes, you’ve probably been in the analysis phase too long. Ask yourself concretely: what is the cost of waiting one more week? If that cost is higher than the cost of making an imperfect decision, it’s time to act.

What if my decision meets resistance from my team?

Resistance after a decision doesn’t automatically mean you made the wrong choice. Distinguish between substantive objections — which are worth taking seriously — and emotional resistance to change, which calls for understanding and clear communication. Open a conversation, listen to the concerns, and explain once more what reasoning underpins your decision. Only adjust your decision if new, relevant information comes to light — not in response to pressure or discomfort.

How do I stop making the same decision-making mistakes over and over?

The most effective approach is to conduct a brief review after every significant decision — even when the outcome was good. Ask yourself three questions: What information did I take into account, and what did I overlook? Which assumptions turned out to be wrong? And what would I do differently in the process next time? By doing this consistently, you build awareness of your personal decision-making patterns and the pitfalls that keep recurring.

Is it a sign of weakness to admit you don't know something?

No — it’s actually a sign of confidence and realism. Leaders who pretend to know everything gradually lose credibility, because employees can see reality too. Saying ‘I don’t know yet, but I’ll find out’ or ‘I need more context on this’ positions you as someone who is honest and thorough. That builds more trust than a confident answer that later turns out to be wrong.

How do I handle pressure from others who expect a quick decision from me?

Distinguish between urgency that genuinely exists in the situation and urgency that is being imposed by others without objective necessity. Sometimes a brief time-out of an hour or a day is enough to make a considered decision rather than an impulsive one. You can acknowledge the pressure without immediately giving in to it: ‘I understand this needs to happen quickly — I’ll have an answer for you by the end of the day.’ That demonstrates both decisiveness and care, without letting yourself be rushed.

What do I do when two good options seem equally attractive?

When two options appear equally strong after careful consideration, it’s worth looking at which one is more reversible — because that one offers the most room to course-correct if the situation changes. Another approach is the so-called ’10-10-10 method’: how will you look back on this choice in ten minutes, ten months, and ten years? That time perspective helps you distinguish what truly matters from what simply feels urgent right now.

How do I build confidence as a decision-maker over the long term?

Confidence as a decision-maker doesn’t grow by waiting for easier decisions — it grows by deliberately practicing with the hard ones. Keep a personal decision journal where you record which decisions you made, on what basis, and what the outcome was. Over time, you’ll start to see patterns that reinforce what works for you. It also helps to surround yourself with a trusted circle of colleagues or a coach who gives you honest feedback, so you don’t have to rely solely on your own perception.