How do I negotiate with a man who doesn’t take me seriously?

juli 16, 2026

Negotiating with a man who doesn’t take you seriously requires a combination of preparation, self-awareness, and smart tactics. You can turn the situation around by firmly anchoring your position, recognizing gender bias for what it is, and making deliberate choices about when to name the dynamic and when to simply push through it. This article answers the most frequently asked questions about negotiating as a woman in an unequal situation.

Why do some men dismiss women at the negotiating table?

Some men take women less seriously at the negotiating table due to a combination of unconscious gender bias, deeply ingrained organizational patterns, and social expectations about who comes across as a credible negotiator. This rarely has anything to do with your actual abilities or preparation — it has everything to do with deep-rooted assumptions about women and power.

Gender bias in the workplace often operates subtly. Behavioral economics research consistently shows that women who negotiate assertively are more quickly labeled as “difficult,” while the same behavior in men is seen as decisive. That double standard makes the negotiating situation structurally more complex for women.

Unwritten rules also play a major role. In many organizations, negotiating has historically been a male domain. Anyone who doesn’t know the unspoken codes of that domain — or doesn’t naturally fit within it — is quickly overlooked or not regarded as a legitimate counterpart. This is not a personal failing. It is a systemic pattern that women need to consciously learn to recognize and navigate around.

How do you tell whether you’re not being taken seriously or whether you’re doubting yourself?

You’re not being taken seriously when the other person’s behavior is consistent and follows a pattern: he interrupts you but not others, ignores your proposals until a male colleague repeats them, or speaks to you in a tone he wouldn’t use with male peers of equal standing. Self-doubt feels different — it comes from within and doesn’t depend on how the other person responds.

The distinction is crucial, because the approach differs accordingly. If the problem lies with you, preparation and building confidence will help. If the problem lies with the other person, you need different tactics. Ask yourself the following questions:

Does he respond the same way to male colleagues who hold similar positions?
Do your ideas only get taken seriously once a man repeats them?
Does he address you differently than he addresses others at the table?
Was he already dismissing you before you had even said anything?

If you answer “yes” to several of these questions, there’s a good chance you’re genuinely dealing with gender bias — not a blind spot of your own. That’s an important distinction to make before deciding on your approach. Self-doubt is normal and human, but it shouldn’t paralyze you or lead you to accept behavior that is, in fact, unacceptable.

What concrete tactics work when a man doesn’t take you seriously?

When you’re not being taken seriously during a negotiation, three tactics work best: firmly anchoring your position before the discussion begins, deliberately using your body language as a signal of authority, and repeating your arguments without apologizing. Assertive negotiating doesn’t mean talking louder — it means positioning yourself more strategically.

Anchoring and repeating

Open the negotiation by stating your position clearly and without hedging language. Avoid phrases like “I was thinking maybe…” or “couldn’t it be that…”. Instead, say: “My proposal is X, based on Y.” If your proposal is ignored, repeat it verbatim — not as a question, but as a statement of fact. Persistence without emotion is a powerful signal.

Body language as a tool

Taking up space is a language everyone understands. Sit up straight, consciously claim your space at the table, make eye contact, and speak in a calm, measured voice. Women who physically make themselves smaller are unconsciously diminished in terms of substance as well. That is no coincidence. By deliberately taking up space, you send a nonverbal signal that you are present and not going anywhere.

What do you do when a man keeps interrupting you during a negotiation?

When you’re repeatedly interrupted, the most effective response is to simply keep talking. Say calmly but clearly: “I wasn’t finished” or “Let me make my point” — and then continue without apologizing. Accepting interruptions by stopping mid-sentence unintentionally signals that the interruption was warranted.

In addition to speaking through interruptions, there are complementary strategies that work well:

Name the pattern neutrally: “I notice I’m being interrupted regularly. I’d like to finish my point.” Say this matter-of-factly, not resentfully.
Use allies: If a colleague or fellow decision-maker is present and sees the dynamic, they can step in and say: “Let her finish.” Arrange this in advance if possible.
Ask a question after the interruption: If he interrupts you and makes his own point, wait — then ask: “My point was X. What’s your response to that?” This brings the conversation back to your agenda.

Interruptions are one of the most common forms of subtle dominance in negotiations. They are rarely consciously hostile, but the impact is real. How you respond to them helps shape how the rest of the negotiation unfolds.

How do you prepare for a negotiation where the other person underestimates you?

The best preparation for a negotiation in which you’re underestimated is to turn that underestimation into an advantage. When the other person underestimates you, their defenses are lower. Use that. Come better prepared than he expects — with concrete facts, a clear goal, and a sharp BATNA (best alternative if the negotiation falls through).

Concrete steps for strong preparation:

Know your goal and your limit: Be clear on what you want to achieve and what the minimum you’ll accept is. Vagueness works against the person who is already being granted less credibility.
Gather facts and figures: Back up your position with concrete data. Facts are harder to dismiss than opinions — especially when the other person is inclined not to take you seriously.
Practice your opening line: The first thirty seconds set the tone. Rehearse a clear, confident opening that immediately establishes your position.
Analyze the other person: What does he want to achieve? What are his interests? The more you know about his motivations, the better you can respond to what drives him.
Prepare for pushback: Think through the most likely objections in advance and formulate your responses. That way, nothing will catch you off guard.

Women who are underestimated actually have an informational advantage in a negotiation: they know they have to work harder to establish credibility and can prepare specifically for that. That is a strategic choice, not a concession.

When is it worth addressing the unequal dynamic directly?

Raising the unequal dynamic is worthwhile when the pattern repeats itself, when it is damaging the outcome of the negotiation, and when you have a relationship with the other person that makes the conversation possible. It is less useful in a one-off negotiation with someone you’ll never speak to again, or when the context is so formal that a meta-conversation would be perceived as unprofessional.

If you decide to name the dynamic, do so in a businesslike, non-emotional way. Avoid accusations and speak in terms of behavior, not intentions. For example: “I notice my proposals aren’t getting the response I’d expect. I’d like to understand what’s going on.” That’s an opening, not an indictment.

There are situations where naming it can be particularly powerful:

When you have an ongoing working relationship and the dynamic is structural
When others are present who also see the pattern, and naming it normalizes the conversation
When the other person sees himself as fair and is likely unaware of his behavior
When staying silent makes the situation worse and further undermines your position

Sometimes it’s more effective to work around the dynamic rather than name it. That’s not weakness — that’s strategic thinking. The choice depends on what will serve you best in that specific situation.

How we help women negotiate more effectively

At Intouch Women, we have been working with ambitious women for nearly 30 years, helping them learn how to negotiate more powerfully, strategically, and effectively. We understand that negotiating with a man who doesn’t take you seriously is not just a matter of technique — it’s also about understanding the unwritten rules that determine who gets credibility and who doesn’t.

Our Masterclass Stratego for Women teaches you exactly that. In practical terms, we work on:

Recognizing and breaking through gender patterns in negotiation situations
Practical negotiation tactics that you can apply directly in your own work environment
Building a strong personal profile so that your credibility is never in question
Stakeholder analysis: understanding what type of player you’re dealing with and how to respond accordingly
Practicing in a safe group setting with women in comparable situations

The program runs for six months and works in small groups of no more than twelve participants, ensuring there is room for your personal situation. Want to learn how to negotiate assertively and strengthen your position — even when the other person underestimates you? Explore the Masterclass Stratego for Women and discover what we can do for you.

Veelgestelde vragen

What do you do when your preparation and tactics aren't working and he keeps ignoring you?

If you've used every tactic and the dynamic still hasn't changed, the next step is to change the context rather than your approach. Consider bringing an ally or decision-maker to the table who can reinforce your position, shifting the negotiation to a different time or format, or escalating the issue through a different channel. Sometimes the most strategic move is to temporarily pause the negotiation and restart it from a stronger position of power.

How do you handle the backlash when you're assertive and get labeled as difficult?

The backlash against assertive behavior is a real risk, but it diminishes the more consistent you are in how you show up. Women who are assertive only occasionally stand out more than women who are consistently assertive. Build a reputation for confidence over time, so that assertiveness becomes an expected part of who you are. Always tie your assertiveness to substance and facts as well, making it harder for others to dismiss you as 'emotional' or 'difficult.'

Does it matter whether the negotiation is about salary, a project, or a business deal?

The underlying gender dynamic is similar in all three situations, but the stakes and your relationship with the other party determine which tactic is most appropriate. In salary negotiations, you have an ongoing relationship to protect, so tone matters. In business deals, you often have more distance and therefore more freedom to be direct. Adapt your approach to the context, but keep the core the same: clear, fact-based, and unapologetic.

How do you build credibility over the long term so you end up in these situations less often?

You build credibility by being visible before the negotiation even begins. Make sure your name is associated with results, speak up in meetings, and position yourself as an expert in your field. The stronger your reputation outside the negotiating room, the harder it is to dismiss you at the negotiating table. This is a long-term investment, but it structurally lowers the barrier you otherwise have to clear every single time.

What if the man who isn't taking you seriously is your direct manager?

When the person underestimating you is also the person influencing your career, that calls for extra strategic thinking. In that case, deliberately build visibility with other decision-makers in the organization, so that your reputation doesn't depend entirely on one person. Document your contributions and results carefully, and consider finding a mentor or sponsor who can support you internally. If the pattern is structural and the situation doesn't improve, it is also entirely legitimate to evaluate whether this work environment truly supports your long-term growth.

Is it smart to adapt your negotiating style to the person across from you, or should you always stay true to yourself?

Adapting and staying true to yourself are not mutually exclusive. Your core message, your boundaries, and your goals remain the same — but the way you communicate them can vary depending on who you're dealing with. Someone who responds to data needs a different approach than someone who is driven by relationships. This isn't capitulation; it's strategic flexibility. The key distinction is that you adapt how you communicate, not what you want to achieve.

How do you know when it's time to seek professional support with negotiating?

Professional support is worthwhile when you notice you keep encountering the same situations without your approach changing, when the stakes in a negotiation are high and you feel insufficiently prepared, or when the gender dynamic is so strong that you can't navigate through it on your own. Coaching doesn't just give you tools — it also gives you a mirror: insight into patterns you may not be able to see yourself. That insight is often the fastest path to a lasting shift in how you position yourself.